|
Biofuel program short of energy The Jakarta Post
Indonesia’s national energy strategy has set out energy diversification
policies focusing on renewable resources to reduce dependence on fossil
fuels, and conservation measures to improve the overall energy
efficiency of the economy.
However, the implementation of these policies has never been consistent,
tending instead to follow the boom-bust cycle of oil prices. When oil
prices rose last year up to US$147 per barrel in July, the government
suddenly trumpeted the vital role of palm oil-based biofuels and the
urgent need to make energy conservation compulsory for industrial
companies.
However, it was back to business as usual once oil prices dropped back
to as low as $35 per barrel early this year. Most palm oil-based
bio-diesel producers had reportedly either stopped production or slashed
their operating capacity to 20 percent, because of policy inconsistency
and an inability to compete with subsidized gasoline and diesel oil.
So,
perhaps it should come as no surprise that since oil prices have surged
again, approaching $70 a barrel, biofuels have resurfaced in the
government energy policy loop.
Last
week, the government proposed to the House of Representatives a 100
percent increase in biofuel subsidies for next year, to Rp 1.5 trillion
($125 million). But even though this amount is less than 1 percent of
the subsidies it has allocated for fuels and electricity this year,
politicians, seemingly ignorant of the crucial importance of such
renewable energy sources as biofuel, balked at the request.
Without the full support of the House, the government will never be able
to achieve even its modest target to increase biofuel consumption in the
transportation sector from 1 percent this year to 3 percent in 2010, and
in other industries from 2.5 percent to 5 percent.
Palm
oil-based biodiesel is actually one of the most promising biofuel
products to be developed in Indonesia because the country has more than
seven million hectares of oil palm estates with an annual output of more
than 19 million tons. The palm oil industry is also a vital contributor
to exports, employment and rural development.
Since only about one-fifth of the total palm oil output is used
domestically for food, soap and other non-energy uses, and the market
price of palm oil tends to follow that of fossil fuels, promoting
biodiesel offers great benefits to producers, including millions of
smallholders, and the economy as a whole.
However, as an infant industry biofuel production should be supported
with tax breaks, subsidies and, at least initially, regulatory
infrastructure to make the use of biofuel mandatory for industries.
As
long as the government continues its current policy of heavily
subsidizing gasoline and diesel oil, biofuels will never be able to
compete with fossil fuels and petrol stations will remain reluctant to
retail this more environmentally-friendly fuel option.
For
the long-term good of the economy, it is better for the government to
allocate much larger subsidies for biofuels, a local product, than for
fossil fuels. Subsidies for biofuels will at least stay in the domestic
economy, but those for fossil fuels will flow out of the country as we
import more than one third of our fossil fuel consumption.
Investors who want to plunge into the biofuels industry also need
clear-cut directives, and manufacturers of transport vehicles and farm
equipment which will use biodiesel will need to know the roadmap for the
future direction of biofuel development because they will have to make
additional investments to adjust their engines to suit.
|