|
Women in RI diplomacy
(by M. Hadianto B. Wirajuda ) The Jakarta Post
One of the milestones of Indonesia’s diplomacy last year was the success
of the ASEAN Charter within which the principles of human rights and
democracy, as well as public participation, were ensured.
However, the inclusion of human rights promotion in the Charter
was not an easy process, knowing the diversity of political systems that
ASEAN member countries have, Indonesia recognized this.
One approach that Indonesian diplomats had in relation to this was to
induce basic rights that were seen as less sensitive to be brought to
the negotiation table, which were the rights of women and children.
However to what extent can the role of women be called significant at
the foreign ministry?
Certainly, in asserting the ideas of the rights of women, as Indonesia
did in the pre-Charter process, Indonesian diplomats took a careful look
at what have been achieved at home. A small measure of this can be
achieved through an examination of the foreign ministry itself, as the
laboratory, as well as the spearhead of foreign policy and diplomacy.
The role of women in Indonesian history has been remarkable. We have had
Ibu Kartini and Cut Nyak Dien who were very influential during the
struggle for Indonesia’s independence. In the contemporary period, we
have had the first female president in history – even a mature a
democracy as America have never had one, although Hillary Clinton came
close – Ibu Megawati Soekarnoputri.
At the forefront of Indonesian diplomacy today, we have, at least, three
senior officials who are influential in their positions. Each of them
has been successful in performing their given mandates.
The significance of women in Indonesian diplomacy has also been
felt abroad, as there are more female ambassadors or deputy ambassadors
and heads of mission at various important locations, such as
Switzerland, Sweden, Brussels and New York.
At the time of their recruitment, there were only about 10 percent of
women who had been accepted to serve the country as diplomats. This
number was quite insignificant compared to other ASEAN countries. The
Philippines, for instance, whose report was made public by the UNESCAP,
women subscribed to about 41.6 percent of the total diplomatic posts in
1995 with, inter alia, 37 heads of mission at ambassadorial rank.
In Indonesia, the common reasons heard to explain this were either the
nomadic nature of diplomats, which was seen as more challenging to women
than men, or personal reasons such as marriage.
The increase in the percentage did not follow the immediate
opening of Indonesia’s political system after the fall Soeharto in 1998.
A significant amount was reached only in 2004 to coincide with a
consolidated democratic period.
As a result of internal regulations that allowed women diplomats to
pursue their careers although they were spouses of male diplomats, the
percentage has gradually increased. In 2006, for example, around 47-48
percent of new diplomats were women. Since then, the number has
continued to increase, reaching about 52 percent today. Certainly,
it is not a bad number for a young democracy.
Indeed, one can say that this is an answer for what is called change.
However, measuring change simply from the quantity would not be enough;
we need to take quality into account.
Unfortunately, the quantity was incomparable with the number of
women who sit at the decision-making level. Looking at Indonesia’s
history of foreign ministers, we have had 14 ministers; however no
account can be taken for a woman minister since the day of the nation’s
birth.
At the lower level, today the public can only witness three out of 13
senior posts at the foreign ministry filled by women. With no intention
of discrediting their importance, this number is worth increasing as the
number of women diplomats is gradually increasing each year. Who would
have guessed, that sometime in the future, Indonesia’s leading foreign
policy actor could be a woman.
In short, we have seen the success of Indonesian women in the struggle
for independence in Indonesian history, but the public are yet to be
satisfied with the significance of the role of women in Indonesia’s
contemporary diplomacy. There is a need for qualified women to be given
more opportunities for roles as decision-makers.
Put in an ASEAN context, one solution can be to assign a qualified
female ambassador to ASEAN countries, by doing so, Indonesia’s idea to
assert human rights through promotion of the rights of women in
Southeast Asia would not be seen as simple rhetoric.
As Ibu Retno Marsudi, one of today’s finest female senior
diplomats once wrote “diplomacy itself has no requirements that could
not be fulfilled by women.”
Any barriers to getting the job done originate mostly from sources
beyond the control of women themselves.”
|